Maybe it was my own guilt at expecting the stereotypes about dick size to be true, but I was suddenly struck with a strange idea. Sure, I could use the book to make my assumptions true, but what if I did the opposite?
"Um, book," I said, "I want to see the average penis sizes for groups which people usually stereotype as having small dicks. Uh, please."
The book compiled. There was something kind of unnerving about the way the ink swirled across the page, but I didn't let my mind dwell on it too long. I had work to do.
On the page in front of me, there were now a far smaller number of sections — all text this time, to my relief. I wasn't entirely sure how I would have gone about editing charts. The first category, to my surprise, was women. I guess the book took my words a little, uh...literally. The next showed men under the age of 20, which I also wasn't expecting, and I quickly moved on. The next few were more what I had in mind.
It came as no surprise that the first section on a specific racial group showed Asian men. Looking at it, it seemed like, in the old world at least, stereotypes didn't hold up particularly well. I'd made the average size for all men 7.3" to 9.5", and Asian men were barely different. According to the book their lower end of average was 7.2", but that was hardly a big enough difference to matter. I skimmed over a couple other racial categories, and saw similar trends.
Below the sections on race were some on build, and other physical attributes. There was a little more variation here — particularly short men were maybe a half inch less hung, on average — but nothing too extreme. As I surveyed my options, I found myself wondering whether I just wanted to give some underdogs a boost, or switch stereotypes altogether? Did I want to create a world of Asian twink doms and black jock bottoms? There was also the question of culture. Would my new changes create a new set of stereotypes, or could I make it so people still thought certain groups had small dicks even when the opposite was true?